It is deeply troubling that in Nigeria, under the guise of “rehabilitation” and “reintegration,” individuals who once terrorized innocent citizens — including Boko Haram insurgents, Fulani militia, and kidnappers — are now being absorbed into sensitive sectors such as the military and police. This practice, which gained significant momentum during the Buhari administration, raises urgent ethical, strategic, and national security concerns.
Numerous reports and eyewitness accounts have highlighted how former terrorists are not only being pardoned but are also undergoing government-sponsored training programs and subsequently reabsorbed into society — with some even making their way into the armed forces. In some instances, disturbing videos have shown these so-called “repentant” militants laughing, shaking hands, and being warmly received by security personnel — a sight that leaves a bitter taste for victims and citizens still grappling with trauma.
According to a 2021 statement by the Nigerian military, over 800 Boko Haram fighters who “repented” were slated for rehabilitation and reintegration through the Operation Safe Corridor program, where they would be profiled, documented, and given vocational training in government-established camps. While this model of post-conflict recovery is common in some global conflict zones, Nigeria’s approach has proven controversial and dangerous due to weak accountability mechanisms and the absence of justice for victims.
Critics have rightfully asked: how can a nation expect genuine security when its law enforcement and armed forces are infiltrated by the very elements that once waged war on its people? The implication is clear: the integrity of the Nigerian security system is being dangerously compromised. In a country where former insurgents are recycled as protectors, trust in the state’s monopoly on violence becomes eroded.
Furthermore, the government’s focus on deradicalizing perpetrators has sidelined the plight of traumatized communities. Survivors — many of whom lost family members, homes, and livelihoods — are left without adequate psychosocial support, restitution, or even assurance of safety. This lopsided reintegration effort has made reconciliation nearly impossible in some areas, especially in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa states, where Boko Haram’s atrocities have been most intense.
In conclusion, there can be no lasting peace without justice. Reintegration policies that prioritize perpetrators over victims undermine national cohesion, embolden criminality, and betray the sacrifices of both civilians and soldiers. Nigeria must urgently rethink this flawed model. True rehabilitation cannot begin without accountability, and security forces must be cleansed of infiltrators if Nigeria is ever to know peace.
