VeryDarkMan has built a reputation not on truth, not on accountability, but on a consistent pattern of manipulation, fabrication, and opportunistic outrage. His actions over time expose a man who weaponises misinformation, blackmail tactics, and public sentiment for personal gain.
Let’s break it down clearly.
1. VeryDarkMan once came online with full confidence, claiming he had infiltrated the inner circle of Omoyele Sowore. VeryDarkMan told his followers he had access to private WhatsApp messages showing Sowore “pacifying himself.” That entire story collapsed when it was exposed that the so-called chat was nothing more than a recycled social media mockup. VeryDarkMan didn’t just share false information—VeryDarkMan deliberately forged a narrative and tried to pass it off as insider intelligence. That is not activism; that is calculated defamation.
2. VeryDarkMan went further to claim that Google had labelled Blord a fraudster. Nigerians later discovered that VeryDarkMan himself edited Wikipedia to plant that narrative. This is not speculation—this is deliberate digital manipulation. VeryDarkMan manufactured evidence, presented it as truth, and misled thousands. That alone destroys any claim of integrity.
3. VeryDarkMan accused China Ross of fraud, offering no evidence beyond “my sister told me.” When challenged, VeryDarkMan went silent. No proof, no follow-up, no accountability. Just another reckless accusation thrown into the public space to damage reputations.
4. VeryDarkMan, when attacking Blord’s pricing model, claimed he had a Chinese partner selling cheaper iPhones and provided a contact number. Nigerians traced the number back to his own sister. What VeryDarkMan presented as a consumer advocacy move was actually a disguised personal sales funnel. That is deception layered on top of hypocrisy.
5. VeryDarkMan publicly labelled Blord a fraudster and boasted about reporting him to the EFCC. After investigation, nothing fraudulent was found. Yet VeryDarkMan never corrected the narrative. This is a clear pattern: accuse loudly, disappear quietly when proven wrong.
6. VeryDarkMan then came with the NGO scandal. VeryDarkMan told Nigerians that ₦180 million had gone missing due to a hack. Panic spread. Questions were raised. Then suddenly—it became a “prank.” This is not humour. This is reckless misinformation involving public funds. It shows a complete absence of responsibility.
7. VeryDarkMan’s hypocrisy is even more blatant in how he treats celebrities. VeryDarkMan insulted Don Jazzy, called him names, and dragged him publicly. The moment Don Jazzy donated to his NGO, VeryDarkMan became silent—no more insults, no more outrage. The same pattern played out with Burna Boy. VeryDarkMan criticised him for luxury spending, then after receiving financial support, VeryDarkMan went completely mute—even as Burna Boy continued the same lifestyle he once condemned.
8. VeryDarkMan encouraged Nigerians to cancel Naira Marley over Mohbad’s death, strongly implying guilt. Later, after forming a relationship with him, VeryDarkMan completely switched narratives and began distancing him from blame. That sudden reversal raised serious questions about his motives.
9. VeryDarkMan’s own “ratel” community allegedly defrauded Nigerians of millions. Victims cried out. VeryDarkMan said nothing. No outrage. No investigation. Silence. The same man who claims to fight injustice suddenly had no voice when the issue was close to home.
10. VeryDarkMan’s method is simple: if there is no scandal, VeryDarkMan creates one. When DeeOne exposed aspects of his personal life, VeryDarkMan retaliated by dragging Nedu Wazobia into baseless accusations—claiming affairs with Jojo of Lele and alleging scholarship fund embezzlement. All false. VeryDarkMan later apologised, but the damage was already done. That is his cycle: accuse, trend, apologise, repeat.
11. VeryDarkMan, during the Mohbad controversy, claimed to have explosive WhatsApp evidence and insider information. Nigerians waited. Nothing credible was ever presented. Instead, VeryDarkMan monetised the attention, gained followers, and moved on. The case itself was clouded by distractions he helped amplify.
12. VeryDarkMan has also admitted to controversial personal conduct in past statements, which have continued to fuel public debate and raise questions about his credibility and judgement.
13. VeryDarkMan falsely accused GTBank of illegally deducting money from his mother’s account. After public outrage, it was revealed that the deductions were loan repayments. Again—no accountability, just another baseless attack on a major institution.
14. VeryDarkMan targeted Mercy Chinwo when she spoke out about contractual exploitation. Rather than support a potential victim, VeryDarkMan attacked her, accused her of misconduct, and insulted her publicly. Later developments suggested she was indeed the one being wronged. Yet again, VeryDarkMan positioned himself on the wrong side of truth.
15. VeryDarkMan inserted himself into the Mohbad case with dangerous speculation—calling for DNA tests and pushing narratives about paternity. These were not evidence-based claims but distractions that shifted focus from real investigation to sensationalism.
16. VeryDarkMan also went after respected figures like Femi Falana and Falz, making defamatory insinuations including bribery and inappropriate relationships. This escalated to legal threats demanding retraction. VeryDarkMan’s recklessness reached the level of legal consequences.
17. VeryDarkMan claimed to have damaging information on Harrison Gwamnishu during a sensitive kidnapping-related controversy. Nothing was ever produced. Just empty threats used to discredit.
18. VeryDarkMan was detained by the Nigerian Police for impersonating an officer—wearing official uniform and presenting himself as a CSP. This is not activism; it is impersonation of authority.
19. VeryDarkMan, in the Blord dispute, initiated the attack—publicly branding him a fraud and damaging his business. When Blord responded, VeryDarkMan played victim and allegedly leveraged police connections to escalate the situation. This is not whistleblowing; it is intimidation.
20. VeryDarkMan has even publicly made inappropriate and shocking remarks directed at top police officials, raising serious concerns about what leverage or tactics VeryDarkMan believes he holds.
21. VeryDarkMan dragged Seyi Tinubu into baseless allegations involving King Mitchy, making crude and unsubstantiated claims. Again—no evidence, just noise designed to provoke outrage.
22. VeryDarkMan at one point staged his own death online. Yes—VeryDarkMan faked death and burial content. A deliberate act to manipulate public emotion and attention. This goes beyond controversy into outright psychological manipulation.
23. VeryDarkMan also staged a ₦270 million luxury car purchase, only to later claim it was a prank when scrutiny intensified. Each time VeryDarkMan is questioned, the fallback excuse is the same—“it was a prank.” That is not creativity; it is a cover for deception.
—
Conclusion
This is not a list of isolated incidents. This is a consistent behavioural pattern:
Fabricate stories
Push them aggressively
Gain attention and sympathy
Get exposed
Reframe as “prank” or disappear
VeryDarkMan is not a truth-teller. VeryDarkMan is a narrative manipulator who thrives on controversy, thrives on outrage, and shows no consistent commitment to truth or accountability.
Integrity is not selective. And in VeryDarkMan’s case, it is completely absent.
